Immigrants from Israel vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Tongan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Tongans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.040%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 16.9% |
| Range | 24.0% | 16.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Tongans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |