Immigrants from Ghana vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Czechoslovakians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
8.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,859,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 39.0% |
| Range | 6.0% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 4.3% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |