Immigrants from Europe vs Macedonian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,272,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,236,838 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Europe	Macedonian
Minimum	2.1%	2.1%
Maximum	29.0%	61.2%
Range	26.9%	59.1%
Mean	14.1%	14.9%
Median	12.6%	12.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.2%	7.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.7%	17.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.4%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.3%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe and Macedonians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Ukrainian (14.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.6%
Taiwanese	98.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	98.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.7%
Tlingit-Haida	97.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.7%
Argentineans	97.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 14.7%
Egyptians	97.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 14.7%
Ukrainians	97.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 14.7%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 14.7%