Immigrants from Croatia vs Czech Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
 Czech
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Czechs
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Czech Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,566,129 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.68%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Czech | 
| Minimum | 0.85% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 25.4% | 32.8% | 
| Range | 24.5% | 31.6% | 
| Mean | 6.7% | 7.7% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Czechs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157  | Good 6.0%  |