Immigrants from Croatia vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Lebanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Lebanese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
66.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,566,129 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,495,735 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.58%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Lebanese |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 25.4% | 27.5% |
| Range | 24.5% | 25.3% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 8.4% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Lebanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |