Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pakistani Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Pakistani
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Pakistanis
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pakistani Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,239,652 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.81%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Pakistani |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 14.6% | 23.0% |
Range | 13.0% | 22.6% |
Mean | 5.7% | 7.7% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pakistanis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |