Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Danes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Danish |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 14.6% | 51.6% |
Range | 13.0% | 50.4% |
Mean | 5.7% | 7.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |