Subsaharan African vs Albanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Albanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Albanians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Albanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,249,073 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Albanian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 9.2% |
| Range | 10.6% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Albanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |