Hungarian vs Ugandan Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Hungarian
Ugandan
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Hungarians
Ugandans
22.4%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Ugandan Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,991,296 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 22.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,935,891 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.8% |
| Range | 94.9% | 48.0% |
| Mean | 28.7% | 23.0% |
| Median | 22.4% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.8% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Ugandans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Czech (22.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (22.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (22.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Western Europe (22.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Lebanese (22.5%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Belgian (22.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (22.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (22.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Taiwanese (22.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Ethiopian (22.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Czechs | 93.5 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 93.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Hungarians | 93.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Norwegians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Lebanese | 92.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Slovaks | 91.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 90.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 89.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 88.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Afghans | 88.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Ethiopians | 87.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Taiwanese | 87.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 87.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Ugandans | 85.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Belgians | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 22.7% |