Filipino vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Immigrants from China
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from China
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.61% |
| Maximum | 10.0% | 12.9% |
| Range | 8.3% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |