Filipino vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Indian (Asian)
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Indians (Asian)
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 12.9% |
Range | 8.3% | 12.4% |
Mean | 4.5% | 5.2% |
Median | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Indians (Asian) by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |