Filipino vs Immigrants from Israel Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Immigrants from Israel
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from Israel
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from Israel Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from Israel |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 24.6% |
Range | 8.3% | 24.0% |
Mean | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Median | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Israel by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |