Filipino vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Burmese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Burmese
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 10.0% | 23.5% |
| Range | 8.3% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 5.3% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Burmese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |