Filipino vs Thai Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Thai
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Thais
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Thai Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,631,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.18% |
| Maximum | 10.0% | 8.6% |
| Range | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Thais by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |