Immigrants from Kuwait vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kuwait
Burmese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kuwait
Burmese
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,900,049 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kuwait | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 23.5% |
| Range | 8.1% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kuwait and Burmese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |