Okinawan vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Okinawan
Burmese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Okinawans
Burmese
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,734,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Okinawan | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 10.6% | 23.5% |
| Range | 8.7% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Okinawans and Burmese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |