Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,541,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 27.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,619,096 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.65%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ecuadorian	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	18.8%	16.1%
Maximum	38.7%	45.8%
Range	19.9%	29.7%
Mean	29.0%	28.6%
Median	28.4%	28.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.7%	26.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.9%	30.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	4.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.6%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.5%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Singapore (27.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Syrian (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%