Czechoslovakian vs African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Africans
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,824,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 9.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | African |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 27.3% |
| Range | 49.6% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 9.7% |
| Median | 7.7% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |