Czechoslovakian vs African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Africans
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,587,703 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 57.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | African |
Minimum | 0.79% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 37.8% |
Range | 15.7% | 35.4% |
Mean | 6.2% | 13.9% |
Median | 5.5% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 16.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 6.6% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and Israeli (12.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |
Panamanians | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.6% |
Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |