Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Egypt Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Egypt
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Egypt
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Egypt Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,460,331 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Egypt |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 12.9% |
| Range | 49.6% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 5.9% |
| Median | 7.7% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |