Croatian vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Croatian
Macedonian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Croatians
Macedonians
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,273,101 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.781 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,583,440 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%.

Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.62% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 25.4% | 4.9% |
| Range | 24.8% | 4.5% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Macedonians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Alsatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Carpatho Rusyn (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |