Chilean vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Macedonian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chileans
Macedonians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,527,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,583,440 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Macedonian |
Minimum | 0.69% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Range | 4.0% | 4.5% |
Mean | 2.2% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.97% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.78% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Macedonians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |