Sierra Leonean vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Macedonian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Macedonians
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Macedonian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,322,147 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,583,440 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.59%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 4.9% |
| Range | 3.5% | 4.5% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.60% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.65% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.64% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Macedonians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |