Creek vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Afghanistan
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,636,321 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 50.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Afghanistan |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 10.2% |
| Range | 28.5% | 8.1% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 5.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |