Creek vs Israeli Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Israeli
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Israelis
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Israeli Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,116,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 49.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Israeli |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.023% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 14.3% |
| Range | 28.5% | 14.3% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 6.0% |
| Median | 11.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |