Creek vs Iraqi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Iraqi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Iraqis
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
62.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Iraqi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,645,130 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 39.1%.
![Creek vs Iraqi Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/creek-vs-iraqis-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Iraqi |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 12.2% |
Range | 28.5% | 10.7% |
Mean | 12.5% | 6.3% |
Median | 11.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |