Creek vs Houma Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Houma
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Houma
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Houma Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,241 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 10.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Houma |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 30.1% |
| Range | 28.5% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 11.2% |
| Median | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Houma by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (9.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 4.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 5.5%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |