Creek vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Luxembourger
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Luxembourgers
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,679,340 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 51.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 12.6% |
| Range | 28.5% | 11.5% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 5.4% |
| Median | 11.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |