Chinese vs Lithuanian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Lithuanian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chinese
Lithuanians
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lithuanian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,348,071 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 8.0% | 13.3% |
| Range | 7.4% | 12.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.82% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Liberians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |