Chinese vs Lithuanian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Lithuanian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chinese
Lithuanians
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lithuanian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,943,876 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 40.3% |
| Range | 19.5% | 37.8% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 16.3% |
| Median | 16.1% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Lithuanians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Austria (16.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Maltese (16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Greece (16.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Scotland (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |