Chilean vs Cambodian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Cambodian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chileans
Cambodians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Cambodian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,625,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,495,279 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Cambodian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 9.9% |
| Range | 6.5% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Cambodians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |