Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,870,733 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,412,525 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 7.8% | 12.1% |
| Range | 7.6% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Bhutanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Alsatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Croatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |