Carpatho Rusyn vs Bahamian Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
 Bahamian
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Bahamians
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Bahamian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,872,415 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,688,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.57%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Bahamian | 
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% | 
| Maximum | 34.3% | 35.8% | 
| Range | 32.4% | 33.4% | 
| Mean | 15.0% | 13.0% | 
| Median | 13.5% | 12.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 13.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Bahamians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Italian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Chinese (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247  | Tragic 12.2%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248  | Tragic 12.3%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249  | Tragic 12.3%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250  | Tragic 12.3%  | 
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251  | Tragic 12.3%  |