Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
 Ecuadorian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Ecuadorians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,738,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Ecuadorian | 
| Minimum | 0.63% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 19.6% | 10.7% | 
| Range | 19.0% | 8.8% | 
| Mean | 7.2% | 5.6% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 5.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 1.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Ecuadorians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187  | Fair 6.2%  |