Bhutanese vs Lithuanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Lithuanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Lithuanians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Lithuanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,829,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 47.1% |
| Range | 13.8% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 9.0% |
| Median | 5.7% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |