Bhutanese vs Celtic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Celtic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Celtics
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Celtic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,862,473 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 16.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 13.8% | 48.7% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 9.7% |
| Median | 5.7% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |