Immigrants from Norway vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,987,847 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 170.9 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $42,563, a difference of 22.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $89,969, a difference of 18.5%), and median household income ($94,846 compared to $80,972, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $49,039, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $59,447, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 68.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.7%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%).