Scottish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Scottish
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Scottish
Zimbabweans
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Scottish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,099,286 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 112.4 Zimbabweans.
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.7%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $90,618, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($44,440 compared to $45,804, a difference of 3.1%).
Income Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,440 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,288 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,101 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,463 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,793 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,397 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,554 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,622 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,123 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,735 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.54%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.0% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.6%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.68%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.2%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.0% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.5% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.1% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.2% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Scottish vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.4%).
Disability Metric | Scottish | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |