Immigrants from Central America vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,912,255 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $45,804, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $110,011, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $106,849, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.47%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $40,798, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 82.1%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.2%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 109.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 91.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.92%).