Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Zimbabweans
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,451,040 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.514% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 514.0 Zimbabweans.
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $65,854, a difference of 11.5%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $106,849, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $45,804, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $40,798, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Good 6.4% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Uruguayan vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.84%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |