Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Vietnamese

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Vietnamese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,058,691 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to an increase of 35.6 Zimbabweans.
Vietnamese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,143 compared to $65,854, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($96,123 compared to $110,011, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,377 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($46,172 compared to $48,229, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,089 compared to $98,586, a difference of 7.0%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,368
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,123
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,248
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Average
$46,172
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,525
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,377
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,127
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,089
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,788
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,143
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.0%
Fair
26.3%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 82.0%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 65.2%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 31.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
84.0%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.9%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 190.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 66.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 23.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 62.7%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Good
6.4%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.81% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Vietnamese vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricVietnameseZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.81%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%