Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hungarians

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Hungarian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,472,082 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 72.5 Zimbabweans.
Hungarian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($86,920 compared to $90,618, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,426 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.83%), median earnings ($47,795 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $98,586, a difference of 1.1%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricHungarianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,426
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,609
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$86,920
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,795
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,309
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,510
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,247
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,544
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,913
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,673
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Fair
26.3%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricHungarianZimbabwean
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHungarianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHungarianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Exceptional
84.0%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHungarianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHungarianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Good
6.4%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.5%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and bachelor's degree (38.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricHungarianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Hungarian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricHungarianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%