Samoan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,622,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $45,804, a difference of 15.0%), median family income ($100,344 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $56,302, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.65%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $90,618, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.3%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%).