Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Zimbabweans
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,653,008 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Zimbabweans.
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,209 compared to $110,011, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,618, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $106,849, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,259, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.8%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.50%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.4% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.5%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |