Yakama vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Yakama
Subsaharan African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Yakama
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,905,065 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 84.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 37.8% |
| Range | 10.0% | 35.0% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Yakama by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Danish (6.6%, a difference of 0.35%), German (6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and African (12.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |