Chilean vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Subsaharan African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Sub-Saharan Africans
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 23.4%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 18.4% | 37.8% |
Range | 16.7% | 35.0% |
Mean | 7.6% | 14.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and African (12.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |