Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from England No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from England
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from England
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from England No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,853,276 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 4.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from England |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 38.3% |
| Range | 37.0% | 35.3% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 10.2% |
| Median | 5.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from England by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |