Zimbabwean vs Chippewa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
 Chippewa
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chippewa
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chippewa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,718,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.88% | 
| Maximum | 37.5% | 38.6% | 
| Range | 37.0% | 37.7% | 
| Mean | 6.6% | 11.3% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 6.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 13.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 7.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 7.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 7.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Chippewa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% | 
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% | 
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% | 
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% | 
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% | 
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% | 
| Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 97.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 9.1% | 
| Maltese | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 9.1% | 
| Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% | 
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% | 
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |