Salvadoran vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Salvadorans
Bahamians
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,977,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 21.9% |
| Range | 24.7% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 9.3% |
| Median | 8.9% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |