Salvadoran vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Sioux
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Salvadorans
Sioux
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,977,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,693,165 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.010%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Sioux |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 44.7% |
| Range | 24.7% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 12.4% |
| Median | 8.9% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Sioux by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |